The Guerrilla Rep
The Guerrilla Rep
  • Home
    • About
    • In the Press
  • Blog
  • YouTube
  • Projects
    • Cicada Moon
    • Film Insight
    • Events >
      • Producer Foundry >
        • Producer Foundry Pitch Workshop
      • Archieve
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Submit
    • Early Stage
    • Completed
  • COVID-19
    • COVID-19 News/Affects
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • Home
    • About
    • In the Press
  • Blog
  • YouTube
  • Projects
    • Cicada Moon
    • Film Insight
    • Events >
      • Producer Foundry >
        • Producer Foundry Pitch Workshop
      • Archieve
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Submit
    • Early Stage
    • Completed
  • COVID-19
    • COVID-19 News/Affects
    • COVID-19 Resources

Why Film Needs Venture Capital

8/17/2014

5 Comments

 
Picture
There’s an old joke that goes something like this.  Three artists move to Los Angeles, a Fine Artist, a poet, and a Filmmaker.  The first day they’re in town, they check out the Mann’s Chinese Theater.  When they get there, a wave of inspiration overtakes them.  The fine artist says, “This is incredible, I have to draw something! Does anyone have a piece of chalk?” Low and behold a random passerby happens to have one, and hands it over. The fine artist does a beautiful rendering on the sidewalk.

Watching this, the poet says, “I’ve had a flash of inspiration, I must write!  Does anyone have a pen and paper?”  It happens to be a friendly sort of Los Angeles day, and someone hands over a pen and paper.  He writes a beautiful Shakespearean sonnet about his friend’s artistry with the chalk.
Picture
​The filmmaker says “This is amazing, I’ve got to make a movie about it!  Does anyone have any money?”
​
Even though the costs of making a film have been cut drastically, the joke remains true.  I mentioned in my last post that the film world is in need of new money, and that what the film world really needs is something akin to Venture Capital.  I think the topic deserves more exploration than a couple paragraphs in a post about transparency.
​Venture capitalists bring far more than money to the table.  They also bring connections and a vast knowledge of financial and industry specific business knowledge to the table.  Essentially these people are experts at building companies, and when you really break it down the best films really are just companies creating a product.

The contribution of connections and knowledge is just as vital to the success of the startup as the money is.  We have something somewhat similar in the film world, it’s generally the job of the executive producer to find the money for the film and put the right people in place to run the production and complete the product.
The biggest problem is that good executive producers with contact to money are few and far between, and there are very few connection points between the big money hubs and the independent film world.  Filmmakers often don’t only need money, they need to have an understanding of distribution and finance that many simply do not have, and most film schools just do not teach.  These positions are generally not full time positions, and most filmmakers just don’t have the money they need to pay people like this.  If a venture capital model were to be adapted in film, the firm could link to these experts, and included in the budget for the film at a cost far less than it would normally be, because the person could split their time between all of the projects represented by the firm.

​Most people understand that filmmakers need money, what many people do not understand is that there are very valid reasons for an investor to invest in film.A good investor knows that a diverse portfolio is far better than one that focuses solely on one industry.  Industries can change and the revenue brought in by any single industry can crash with little notice.  Savvy investors will seek to have money in many pots as it really helps to weather through downturns.  Film is considered to be a mature industry, and has grown steadily over the past several years, even in the economic downturn.  In fact, the film industry is moderately reversely dependent on the economy, so it often does better in economic downturns.
The biggest problem is that most investors just don’t invest in things they don’t know.  Investors need to understand an investment before they put money into it.

Film is a highly specialized and inherently risky business.  All the money goes away before any comes back, and that can scare off many investors.  Especially since they often don’t understand what a good use of resources for a film is and are often incapable of seeing when the project should be stop-lossed as to not lose any more money.

One solution a venture capital firm could bring to this industry that single investors simply cannot is stage financing. Stage financing is a system of finance that is widely used in Silicon Valley.  The concept is basically that the investors only release funds once certain checkpoints are met.  Single angel investors do not have the time or expertise to act in this way, which is a big part of the reason for the standard escrow model.   If a project that makes it through the screening process is only given the money they need for pre production up front, they must pass a review to have funds released for principle photography then it becomes a far more sustainable investment.
​Filmmakers may balk at the idea of review, but quite frankly so long as the production is being well managed, they should be able to complete the checkpoints and have the additional funds released with little difficulty, assuming that the right review panel is put in place.  The fund itself has every reason to see it’s projects through to completion, so it will only be filmmakers who are not doing their jobs that end up not passing the review process.

Edit: Additionally, there are deals that can be made to help agents and bankable talent feel more comfortable with such a process.  This may be a subject of a later blog, and is mentioned in the comments.

Why does the fund have every reason to see films through to completion?   Because if the films are not completed, then the fund will have lost all the money it put in with no chance of getting it back.  That said, if the production is a disaster, and it’s clear that additional funds would not actually result in a finished and marketable film, then it is far better to cut losses and move on with other projects that have higher potential for revenue.

As mentioned in the last blog, a lack of transparent accounting is also a big issue with investors.

A single filmmaker does not really have the ability to negotiate with a distributor, at least not to a level necessary to resolve the transparency issue. In the relationship, the distributor has all of the power and there’s really very little most filmmakers, especially those just starting out, can do to change that.
​But in film as in any industry, money talks. If there were a venture capital firm for film that only worked with distributors who have transparent books, and those distributors could then turn around and propose new projects to the venture capital firm, then some of the issues of transparent accounting could start to change.  Many distributors, especially those working in the low budget sphere, are continually raising money for their own projects.  So, having a good relationship with a venture capital firm is a big incentive to maintain good books and responsible business practices for filmmakers.


It got listed in the comments section of Black Box that filmmakers shouldn’t necessarily need to have that much business sense, since it takes their whole being to create.  Filmmaking is indeed a collaborative effort, and it’s not a director’s job to think about target demographics and marketing strategies.  The problem is the people in the film world that truly understand investment and recoupment are few and far between.  Many of them also take advantage of filmmakers, as evidenced by the stories of studio accounting from Black Box.  Part of what’s needed is the creation of teams that have what it takes to both tell quality stories with high production values, also get the films to market and figure out exit strategies, target demographics, and general budget recoupment tactics.

Many Film Schools just don’t teach this part of the business.  Film schools focus everything on how you can make the film, and what it takes to do it, but few of them really give you the ability to actually go raise money.  So what’s really needed is a new class of producer that understands the executive side.  What’s really needed is a new class of investor that understands what it takes to invest in film, the risks, the rewards, and how it’s diversified.  What’s really needed in film is a company that can successfully link the two together, and create a new class of media entrepreneur.  What’s really needed is an incubator for independent film with a team that can execute both of these aspects and create a sustainable business model out of it.

Right now no such organization really exists, although I’ve been trying to start one with my work at the IIFF, Global Film Ventures, and more recently Producer Foundry.   It’s clear that the industry is changing, but quite frankly it needs to.  The best way to effect the change in practices that need to happen in the industry is to change the way the industry is financed.  The entrance of a venture capital firm into the film industry would do just that, and is exactly why it needs to happen.
Picture
If you liked this blog, your might be the type who would make a good executive producer.  If you are, but don't know how to go about doing that, then you should consider my Executive Producer Expressway Program.  In it, you'll learn how to package your movie by getting LOIs from Sales agents and attaching name talent, finance your movie not only from equity from angel investors, but also other less expensive ways to get the money you need to make your film, financing your film with tactics other than film festivals and social media, and how to get good distribution deals, how to know what a bad distribution deal is, and what you can generally negotiate.  This program starts with a completely free strategy session to assess where you are and chart a path to where you're going.  
Sign up for your FREE Strategy Session Today!
Picture

Want more information from an industry insider?  Check out this book!

Picture
Film markets are ahard thing to understand, luckily, there's a book to help guide you through those turbulent waters.  The Guerrilla Rep: American Film MArket distribution success on no budget is the first book on film markets, and used as a text in film schools across the country.   

Find your local bookstore

Guerrilla Rep Media doesn't just support indie bookstores and film schools, we also support public libraries.  If you want to save some budget to get better printed materials, ask for a copy there.

Find your local library now!

Also available at these fine retailers.

Picture
Picture
Picture

Related Content from Ben

Picture
The 9 Ways to Finance your Indiefilm
Picture
One Simple Tool to Re-opening conversations with investors
Picture
The 12 Slides you need in your IndieFilm Investment deck.
5 Comments
JLR
2/25/2015 12:08:16 am

I have no problem with this model in theory, and would love to find a way to make it workable.

However, the idea of a review between pre-production and the start of principle is not workable in the context in the real world of contracting with actors who have any sales value. These actors or either in demand for other films or working regularly in television. I finished a film last year with a star who was under contract to a TV show and I had to shoot around her very limited schedule. She wouldn't have signed on in pre-production if I couldn't guarantee particular shoot dates. Other actors who auditioned had constraints as well. Some weren't under contract until principal had already begun. This is not uncommon when dealing with LA and NY talent.

I'm all for a staged system if it attracts real money, but the placement of the stages has to work within industry constraints.

Reply
Ben Yennie link
4/7/2016 11:08:33 am

First, apologies for being so late on this reply.

I see your point, However, there are easily ways to keep a staged financing model as laid out and not lose actors between pre-production and principle photography. Sure, there's a check in at Pre-Production, but this is more to ensure the project hasn't become completely untenable. More than likely the money would be released. it could be structured that if notable talent were attached, then they would be paid even if the budget never came through, possibly with a penalty paid by the VC firm. Again, the incentives should be in line, and this seems like they would be.

Reply
Hosea Jemba link
2/12/2016 09:39:26 am

Very informative.

Reply
Ray link
4/21/2016 04:27:41 am

It is not about the dance moves that are difficult. It is finding the VC willing to put the seed money up.

Reply
Ben Yennie link
4/27/2016 06:21:21 pm

A couple of points here.

First, there are many differences between angel investors and Venture Capitalists. The primary being that Angels invest their own money, VCs invest other people's. Given the fact that VCs invest other people's money there is a much lower tolorance for risk, and given the general amount of risk involved in a film, most institutions cannot justify touching it.

Second. In so far as I am aware, there is currently no VC firm that specializes in Independent Film. Dogfish tried to make an incubator for it, but ultimately gave up due to the long time frame before seeing any money from their incubated projects. Institutional financing entities AKA Venture Capital Firms, would be turned away from this sort of investment, due to the large up front investment. I have heard of Hedge funds using some of their money allocated towards diversified high risk investments on film, but that often ends up going to higher budget films with talent attached. I.E. Junction Investments.

Third, sure. The dance isn't that difficult to do passably, but doing it well is a very large matter of finesse and understanding of investment, securities, and revenue models. Although you can hire lawyers for that. The harder part is knowing how to negotiate, and when to walk away. That takes a lot more skill than is readily acknowledged. The distance between interest and closing the deal is much further than most acknowledge.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    My name is Ben, I'm an Entrepreneur, Producer's Rep, and Author.  I'm the founder of Guerrilla Rep Media, Co-Founder/CMO of ProductionNext, and founder of Producer Foundry.  Together, the organizations seek to help make filmmaking a more economically sustainable endeavor.  I am dysic, I have capitalization issues, and the blogs are often unedited. opinions all my own.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Join my Mailing List for FREE Resources!

    I'm happy to offer a FREE Resource Package to anyone who joins my mailing list.  You'll also recieve monthly digests of my articles and other valuable resources.
    Sign Up!

    My Books

    Picture
    Find it at
    Your Local Library
    Books Inc
    Barnes and Nobles
    ​Amazon

    Audiobook Free through Audible.com

    Picture

    Available exclusively through Amazon.com​

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2015
    August 2014

    Categories

    All
    Affiliates
    AFM
    Aggregation
    Angel Investing
    Angel Investment
    Audience Engagement
    AVOD
    Branding
    Business Plan
    Business Planning
    Career Growth
    Community
    Contracts
    Crowdfunding
    Data
    Deck
    Distribution
    Distribution Agreements
    Distribution Deliverables
    Distributors
    DVD
    Email Marketing
    Entertainment
    Entrepreneurialism
    Executive Summary
    Film Budgeting
    Film Distribution
    Film Festivals
    Film Finance
    Film Financing
    Film Industry
    Film Investment
    Filmmaking
    Film Marketing
    Film Markets
    Film Money
    Financing
    First Feature
    Genre
    Grants
    Grantwriting
    Hustle
    Indiefilm
    International
    International Sales
    Look Book
    Markeing
    Marketing
    Marketing Materials
    Packaging
    Packaging Documents
    Physical Media
    PR
    Press
    Producer's Rep
    Publicity
    Sales Agency
    Sales Agents
    Screenplay
    Script
    Self Distribution
    Short Films
    Social Media
    Staged Financing
    Studio
    SVOD
    Tax Incentives
    Technology
    Terminology
    Transparency
    Venture Capital
    Waterfalls

    RSS Feed

Home

About

Services

Menu

Contact

Copyright © 2019 Guerrilla Rep Media.  All rights reserved